Ethical Considerations for Children Undergoing Surgery: Evaluation of Graduate Nursing Students’ Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/2291-5796.168Keywords:
Surgery, Children, Nursing, Online Learning, EthicsAbstract
Background: To challenge dominant conceptions of children and innovate nursing education, our team created an open-access training module (https://childsxethics.net/) addressing ethical considerations for children undergoing surgery.
Objective: To evaluate the level of Bloom’s Taxonomy cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning reached by graduate nursing students after completing the training module.
Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using Bloom’s Taxonomy. Data sources comprised of participants’ course assignments.
Results: Participants (n=19) wrote 19 online reflections, 43 peer responses and completed two group assignments. The module and associated class assignments promoted high levels of cognitive and affective learning. The type of assignment influenced participants’ levels of learning. Cognitive and affective learning processes were enhanced when integrating reflections and fostering interactions among learners.
Implications: Study findings will inform future iterations of the training module. Our innovative educational resource will facilitate the recognition of children as active moral agents and improve their surgical experiences.
Downloads
References
References
Behan, J. M., Arora, R. S., Carnevale, F. A., Bakhshi, S., Bhattacharjee, B., & Tsimicalis, A. (2021). An Ethnographic Study of the Moral Experiences of Children with Cancer in New Delhi, India. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393621995814
Boer, M. C. den, Zanin, A., Latour, J. M., & Brierley, J. (2022). Paediatric residents and fellows ethics (PERFEct) survey: Perceptions of European trainees regarding ethical dilemmas. European Journal of Pediatrics, 181(2), 561–570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04231-8
Bray, L., Appleton, V., & Sharpe, A. (2019). The information needs of children having clinical procedures in hospital: Will it hurt? Will I feel scared? What can I do to stay calm? Child: Care, Health and Development, 45(5), 737–743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12692
Carnevale, F. A. (2020). A “rhick” conception of children’s voices: A hermeneutical framework for childhood research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920933767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920933767
Carnevale, F. A., Collin-Vézina, D., Macdonald, M. E., Ménard, J. F., Talwar, V., & Van Praagh, S. (2021). Childhood ethics: An ontological advancement for childhood studies. Children & Society, 35(1), 110–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12406
Chabeli, M. M. (2010). Concept-mapping as a teaching method to facilitate critical thinking in nursing education: A review of the literature. Health SA Gesondheid (Online), 15(1), 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v15i1.432
Chao, S. Y., Chang, Y. C., Yang, S. C., & Clark, M. J. (2017). Development, implementation, and effects of an integrated web-based teaching model in a nursing ethics course. Nurse Education Today, 55, 31–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.011
Dave, R.H. (1970). Psychomotor levels. In R. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Developing and writing behavioral objectives (pp. 20–21). Educational Innovaters Press.
Esser, F. (2016). Reconceptualising agency and childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722245
Fortier, M. A., & Kain, Z. N. (2015). Treating perioperative anxiety and pain in children: A tailored and innovative approach. Pediatric Anesthesia, 25(1), 27–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12546
Gabriel, M. G., Wakefield, C. E., Vetsch, J., Karpelowsky, J. S., Darlington, A. S. E., Cohn, R. J., & Signorelli, C. (2019). Paediatric surgery for childhood cancer: Lasting experiences and needs of children and parents. European Journal of Cancer Care, 28(5), e13116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13116
Gabriel, M. G., Wakefield, C. E., Vetsch, J., Karpelowsky, J. S., Darlington, A. S. E., Grant, D. M., & Signorelli, C. (2018). The psychosocial experiences and needs of children undergoing surgery and their parents: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 32(2), 133–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.08.003
Heath, C., Bavich, P., Sommerfield, A., & von Ungern-Sternberg, B. S. (2023). Kids Voices, the perioperative experience of emergency surgery from children’s perspectives: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling, 110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.107674
Heilporn, G., & Lakhal, S. (2020). Investigating the reliability and validity of the community of inquiry framework: An analysis of categories within each presence. Computers & Education, 145, 103712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103712
Hogan, D. (2005). Researching ‘the child’ in developmental psychology. In S. Green & D. Hogan (Eds.). Researching children’s experience: Approaches and methods (22-41), Sage Publications.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Kaddoura, M., Van-Dyke, O., & Yang, Q. (2016). Impact of a concept map teaching approach on nursing students’ critical thinking skills. Nursing & Health Sciences, 18(3), 350–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12277
Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(2), 147–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Krathwohl, DR. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(Part 4), 212–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S , & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Book II. Affective domain. David McKay Co Inc.
Martakis, K., Czabanowska, K., & Schröder-Bäck, P. (2016). Teaching ethics to pediatric residents: A literature analysis and synthesis. Klinische Pädiatrie, 228, 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-109709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-109709
Montreuil, M., & Carnevale, F. A. (2016). A concept analysis of children’s agency within the health literature. Journal of Child Health Care, 20(4), 503–511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493515620914
Mukhalalati, B. A., & Taylor, A. (2019). Adult learning theories in context: A quick guide for healthcare professional educators. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840332
Pavin Ivanec, T. (2022). The lack of academic social interactions and students’ learning difficulties during COVID-19 faculty lockdowns in Croatia: The Mediating Role of the Perceived Sense of Life Disruption Caused by the Pandemic and the Adjustment to Online Studying. Social Sciences, 11(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020042
Plantz, D.M., Garrett, J.R., Carter, B., Knackstedt, A.D., Watkins, V.S., & Lantos, J. (2014). Engaging pediatric health professionals in interactive online ethics education. Hastings Center Report, 44(6), 15–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.383
Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (Tenth edition.). Wolters Kluwer Health.
Qureshi, M.A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S.A., & Yousufi, S.Q. (2021). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(4), 371–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180411
Shoemaker, S.J., Wolf, M.S., Brach, C., & Amsterdam 201409. (2014). Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): A new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Education and Counseling, 96(3), 395–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027
Sorden, S.D. (2013). The cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In B. J. Irby, G. Brown, R. Lara-Alecio, & S. Jackson (Eds.), The Handbook of Educational Theories (pp.157–168). Information Age Publishing.
Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09792-3
Wang, Y. W., Carnevale, F. A., Chougui, K., & Tsimicalis, A. (2022a). On 'how Children’s participation ought to be practiced: A preliminary ethical framework to optimise the participation of children with osteogenesis imperfecta in health care?' Journal of Clinical Nursing. 32(15–16), 5410–5411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16609
Wang, Y. W., Carnevale, F. A., Ezcurra, M., Chougui, K., Siedlikowski, S., & Tsimicalis, A. (2022b). The moral experiences of children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Nursing Ethics, 1773–1791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330221105635
Zhang, F., Zhao, L., Zeng, Y., Xu, K., & Wen, X. (2019). A comparison of inquiry-oriented teaching and lecture-based approach in nursing ethics education. Nurse Education Today, 79, 86–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ariane Gautrin, RN, MSc N. , Yi Wen Wang, RN, M.Ed., PhD(c), Raissa Passos dos Santos, RN, PhD, Franco A. Carnevale, RN, PhD, Amanda Cervantes, RN, Argerie Tsimicalis, RN, PhD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1969b/1969b75d43f222ee39a1dfab014e298d35e3fc1b" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Witness publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC 4.0). Read the license terms at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. The author(s) retain copyright to their works.